| The development of the Periodic Table (post-16) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
John Newlands |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Could the original formulation of the Periodic Table be regarded as British? Just four years before Mendeleev announced his Periodic Table, John Alexander Reina Newlands wrote in Chemical News
Surely this was a prediction of patterns in the properties of the elements and described a Periodic Table? Newlands thought that patterns were connected with the relative weights of atoms (we would now call them relative atomic masses – they were then called atomic weights) of different elements. Fortunately, in 1860 there had been a conference in Karlsruhe (Germany) which had made a more accurate list of these atomic weights than had previously been available. Not only had some values been slightly wrong through inaccurate measurements but some were half or a third of the correct value through false reasoning. See Problems with relative atomic masses. One difficulty was that only about 60 elements were known then (there are over 100 now), although fortunately most of the undiscovered ones were of higher relative atomic mass. Newlands listed those known in order of their atomic weight putting their position in this sequence alongside the symbol. He did not give a name to this position number. A copy of his table is shown below using the symbols Newlands used.
The pattern was perfect up to calcium then became less convincing as some metals appeared unlike the non-metals to their left. However a further seven elements later there was a greater similarity. Then Newlands was forced to sometimes put two elements in the same box so that after this similar elements would be in the same horizontal line. Di stood for didymium, which we now know is not an element at all but a mixture of two elements. Note that Newlands did not always stick to a strict increase in number. He exchanged the positions of Zn and Y, presumably because he realised that Y resembled Bo (modern symbol B). The modern Periodic Table does not always show an increase in relative atomic masses for successive elements but it is a less common occurrence than in Newlands’ table. On 1st March 1865, he described his ideas at a lecture at the Chemical Society (a forerunner of the Royal Society of Chemistry). The lack of spaces for undiscovered elements and the placing of two elements in one box were justifiably criticised but an unfair suggestion from Professor Foster was that he might have equally well listed the elements alphabetically. Foster was on the Publication Committee which refused to publish his paper, supposedly because it was of a purely theoretical nature. Humiliated, Newlands went back to his work as chief chemist at a sugar factory. Four years later Mendeleev, unaware of Newlands' ideas, formulated an improved Periodic Table which gained acceptance, particularly because he left spaces for undiscovered elements, some of which were soon found with properties he predicted. As the Periodic Table became accepted, Newlands, understandably, claimed its first publication. However the Chemical Society did not back his claims. Indeed the final years of his working life were spent running a family chemical business with his brother. The Chemical Society made some amends for discrediting him by asking him in 1884 to give a lecture on the Periodic Law. However its full recognition of his discovery waited until 1998, the centenary of his death, when the Royal Society of Chemistry oversaw the placing of a blue commemorative plaque on the wall of his birthplace. Note its inscription.
Reproduced courtesy of Gordon Woods QuestionsQ 1. Newlands was the first person to give elements a 'position number'. (a) What do we call this today? (b) What property of the atomic nucleus is it related to? Q 2. Newlands believed that didymium was an element when it was in fact a mixture of neodymium and praseodymium. In Newlands’ time it was difficult to prove that a substance was not an element. How would we go about this today? Q 3. (a) In an experiment, 6.40 g of copper were made by reacting 8.00 g of copper oxide with hydrogen. Work out the equivalent weight of copper from this data. (b) If the valency of copper is taken as 2, what does this give as the atomic weight of copper? (c) Why might it be possible to confuse the valency of copper? Q 4. There are some unfamiliar symbols. Give the modern symbols and names of Gl and Bo. Q 5. One element that is significantly wrongly placed in Newlands’ table is uranium (U). This is because the value Newlands used for its relative atomic mass was very wrong. (a) Look at the position of uranium (U) in Newlands’ table and estimate the value of relative atomic mass that Newlands used by referring to the elements above and below it. (b) Suggest how this incorrect value had come about. Q 6. What do columns in the Newlands’ table almost correspond to in a modern Periodic Table? Q 7. Where do the alkali metals Li, Na, K etc appear in Newlands’ table? Give the names of the extra elements mixed with them. Why do you think Newlands thought they had a similarity with the alkali metals? Q 8. How many elements are there between Li and Na, or Na and K? What should this figure be? Explain the difference. Q 9. Give two ways in which the Newlands’ table is inferior to that of Mendeleev. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||